What is open source software


Director Of Liability

If you sit on a Board of Directors of asecured creditors even those who had security
corporation then exposure to liability existson the assets of a company prior to CRA
under various statutes. For example, unpaidhaving a debt owed, such as a General
wages and vacation pay, workplaceSecurity Agreement by a banking institution.
liabilities, liabilities under corporateThis priority is given to CRA through the
statutes as well as environmental liabilitiesIncome Tax Act. If the company continues to
are a major concern of the corporatego forward in a receivership CRA must be paid
director.for  any  arrears  in  crown  taxes.
Amounts owing to the Crown with respect toThere are only a few defenses available to a
taxes are the most common of the liabilitydirector in order to avoid payment of the
claims. Unremitted source deductions whichliability. In order to be liable you must be
consists of income taxes, employmenta 'director in law" at the time the source
insurance and Canada Pension Plan premiumsdeductions were not remitted. For example,
from employee wages is the liability that thethe individual may not have been properly
Crown has been very aggressive in collectingappointed as a director or may have resigned
in recent years. The Crown is also being moreprior  to  the  failure  to  remit.
aggressive in the collection of other taxes
such as unpaid sale taxes and the everIf the above exemptions do not apply then the
controversial  Goods  and  Service Tax (GST).only defense is the "due diligence" defense
as set out in the Income Tax Act. This
A common scenario in creating director'sdefense provides that the director is not
liability is that a business that isliable for the corporation's failure to remit
struggling financially is using thesource deductions where he/she exercises the
unremitted source deductions as capital todegree of care, diligence and skill to
keep the corporation in business rather thanprevent the failure that a reasonably prudent
close the doors. However, when theperson would exercise in a similar situation.
corporation realizes that the unremitted
source deductions is not enough capital toIn determining if a director has acted with
keep the operations going, the company goesdue diligence the court will look at a
out of business. Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)variety of factors such as, the capability of
has a statutory right to go after thethe person, their business knowledge,
directors for unremitted source deductionseducation and the actions taken by the
plus  interest  and  penalties.director to prevent the failures. The courts
have stated that there is a positive duty to
For CRA to successfully claim against atake  action  to  prevent  the  failures.
director it must meet certain requirements
under the Income Tax Act. CRA must file aTo prevent failure the director should
certificate in respect of the corporationsfamiliarize himself with the withholding and
tax liability and CRA must attempt to haveremittance requirements. Ensure that an
execution against the corporation and theappropriate system is in place to withhold
execution must be returned unsatisfied. Inand remit all taxes and require on a timely
the case of a liquidation in bankruptcy, CRAbasis written reports to ensure that the
must prove its claim within 6 months of theremitting procedures are being done
date of bankruptcy. If these actions have notcorrectly.
been met by CRA then the director has no
liability.It is human nature especially for most
entrepreneurs to do anything to find away to
CRA also has only 2 years to attempt tokeep the doors of their company open. This
collect the liability from the director. Ifdetermination sometimes leads to the careless
the 2-year period passes then the directoruse of unremitted source deductions and other
escapes any liability for the unremittedgovernment taxes to fund the operations. The
deductions. In order to attempt to collectcourts have said where a corporation reaches
from the director, it must be establishedthe point where it cannot issue a remittance
that the funds could not be collected fromcheque for fear that it won't be honored it
the corporation or from the Receiver oris time to close down the business. Thus, the
Trustee  in  bankruptcy.mere decision or will of the entrepreneur to
keep the doors open may result in the
CRA has first priority on all assets of adirector reducing his/her ability to rely on
bankrupt company. If a company files athe due diligence defense.
bankruptcy CRA has priority over all other



1 A B C 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86