What is open source software


xinitsystems.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

history on operating systems advances  

Socio-Technical Systems and Organizational Values

Modern organizations define themselves usingbeliefs and commitments. Not all cited here;
statements of vision. They state their visionhowever, these selected ones reinforce
in terms of human resources and technology, aconcepts of socio-technical systems.- Results
socio-technical view. Modern organizationsOriented - The Logistics Center constantly
also define themselves in terms of values.drives for results and success. We drive
New employees entering the organization learnissues to closure, persist despite obstacles
the value system from employees withand opposition, and maintain a high energy
longevity in it. How organizationslevel. Our employees readily put in the
incorporate socio-technical systems as aneeded time and effort to achieve
reinforcement tool of their value system isresults.- Innovation - The future of the
the focus of this paper.ValuesIn business,Logistics Center is assured only as long as
small and large, values determine course theit welcomes and rewards innovation,
business sets for itself. Yukl (2006) definescreativity, and resourcefulness. We recognize
values as key statements of an organization."trial and error" as being elements of
The value statement is ideological, what theinnovation and continuous improvement.
organization considers important. Many valuesInnovation has been the cause of success for
find their way into organizations includingthe Logistics Center.- Quality - We provide
customer service, innovation, satisfaction ofthe best quality in all of our products and
internal and external constituents, andservices. Our goal is to exceed industry
excellence. Yulk's view of values suggestsbenchmarks.- People - People are our most
something deeper. Organizational values andimportant resource. We respect the
value creation are the soul of competitiveindividual's dignity and value their
edge, competitive advantage.Hill and Jonescontributions. We invest in training and
(1998) write of management values aseducation to give our employees the tools to
statements of how managers will conductmake the Logistics Center a world-class
themselves and how they will do business.organization.- Teamwork and Collaboration -
Managers in high performing businessesThe Logistics Center provides a positive and
conduct themselves with stakeholders in mind.challenging environment that supports the
Winston (2002) suggests that high performingachievement of mission goals and fosters team
leaders accept the values of the organizationspirit. We are partners with our customers,
as being of higher consequence andstakeholders, suppliers, and are committed to
importance.SystemsValues of an organizationunion/management partnerships.- Integrity and
(customer service, innovation, satisfaction)Openness - The Logistics Center values trust,
imply an organization is a system. Sengesincerity, honesty, and candor in
(1990) tells us that organizations arerelationships both personally and
organic systems of interconnected andorganizationally. We encourage our employees
interrelated sub-groups. This suggests moreto express ideas, opinions, and thoughts in
than brick and mortar structures, it suggestsan honest and genuine manner.- Corporate
organizations of people, technology, andCitizenship - The Logistics Center values a
social interaction. Technology, according topositive corporate image and is sensitive to
Davis (1996), is a "conceptual bridge"our corporate responsibilities to the
between science and economics. This linkcommunity. We actively participate and
gives form to how organizations manage.support  community  involvement.
Conversely, Wren (2005) presents the view of
technological change being disturbing to theIn post-industrial organizations, STS helps
social system of an organization.leaders create constructs that are enabling,
Socio-technical systems offer leverage toempowering, in turn, enabling and empowering
dispel the disturbing nature ofaccelerates communication, and learning and
change.Socio-Technical SystemsLee (2000)knowledge. Within the context of knowledge
explains social of the socio-technicalbuilding and knowledge, sharing, STS, through
systems as the habitual attitudes of people.collaboration, allows work groups'
He includes the relationships between peopleflexibility to develop original work patterns
with their values and behavioral styles. Heand competitive advantage.Leaders Role in
also describes it as the formal powerSTSDavis (1996) urges successful leaders to
structure identified using traditionallead as if the future is now. Accomplishing
organizational charts. However, he continuesthis means seeing the final product rather
with the aspect of an informal powerthan the processes of the product. STS
structure based on influence and knowledge.employs the right people and the right
The technical system makes up second part oftechnology at the right time within a
the dyad. This system, according to Leestructure that supports organizational
(2000), is "machinery, processes, proceduresvalues.
and a physical arrangement."A socio-technical
system, abbreviated STS for the remainder ofIn an environment of rapid change, having a
this paper, is people and technology blended.competitive advantage allows organizational
Yet, this is a much too simple definition.foresight. However, foresight requires
Some elements of STS are closelymaintaining core values. Socio-technical
interrelated; therefore, it is not easy tosystems support organizational values by
distinguished items within a STS as purelymaintaining organizational memory and shared
technical or purely social. Aldridge (2004)experiences. Memory and shared experiences
explains STS as approaching organizationalprovide views of where the organization was
work groups as social systems and macrowhile keeping everyone tracking toward future
social systems. A third level of workvision. An organization with strong STS
observed is primary work systems. The primarystandards uses their technology to preserve
work system according to Aldridge is one orhistory, create performance benchmarks, and
more work units involved in face-to-facedevelop knowledge and learning environments.
work. Work units collaborate jointly and haveStrong quality systems demonstrate teams'
support of management, relevant technology,abilities to eliminate obsolete practices
resources, and workplace specialists.while staying within the framework of
Aldridge includes the writings of Tristoriginal values.ConclusionStated earlier,
(1981) when defining macro social systems,organizations are systems of interrelated
"...macro social systems include systems inparts with differing skills and skill levels.
communities and entire business sectors asSTS, working within an organizations value
well as societal institutions" (Trist, 1981,system promotes wisely those with skills,
pg. 11). The STS design in work groups isknowledge, and ability. Additionally, STS,
increasing productivity of the group andworking with the value system, provides
increasing job satisfaction throughworkers with the tools needed to grow in the
optimization of social factors andskills, knowledge, and abilities so they,
integration with technical factors.Elementstoo, can be promoted. Members of
of STSAccording to an anonymous article onself-directed teams seek new or improved
STS, the author explains some of theskills from within the STS and through their
components integrated into a functionalinterconnection  with  team  members.
socio-technical system. Explained separately,
each component has its own character;Self-directed teams improved productivity
however, it is clear how closely linked eachand commitment to the team and organization
is and overlaps the others.- Hardware isin English coalmines in 1949 and
computers and computing peripherals, theself-directed teams continue being productive
classic technology of modern business.and committed. Therefore, an organization
Organizations today do not exist without someemploying socio-technical systems can grow
kind of computing network, connecting wires,into the future, yet hold fast to its
routers, and individualhistorical past and the values making the
workstations.- Software includes operatinggroup  viable.References
systems (Windows, UNIX, Apple, etc). As
technology advances, it is increasinglyAldridge, J. W. (2004). aboutChange
difficult to separate hardware and software.Solutions. Encyclopedia of Distributed
Software varies based on organizationalLearning (ISBN 0-7619-2451-5). Thousand Oaks,
needs; yet software allows companies toCA:  Sage  Publications.
create data for storage on hardware devices.
The software often runs from the sameAnonymous, (no date). Why a Social-Technical
hardware devices used for storage. SoftwareSystem? Retrieved online January 12, 2006
facilitates social interaction by allowingfrom
distantly remote people an opportunity to
message each other in almostAnonymous, (1996 - May-June). Maintaining
real-time.- Physical surroundings (physicalOrganizational Memories. TQM/CCI News.
setting) help establish the social andRetrieved  January  22,  2006  from
technical rules of engagement. Building with
an open floor plan and open desk arrangementDavis, S. (1996). Future Perfect. Reading,
allows open social interaction among workers.MA:  Addison-Wesley.
Buildings with offices separating workers
reduce interaction. Managers with an innerHill, C. W. L. & Jones, G. R. (1998).
sanctum guarded by a secretary's officeStrategic Management: An Integrated Approach.
establish a hierarchy of power.- People, byBoston,  MA:  Houghton  Mifflin  Company.
name and by title, make up an integral part
of any organization culture, socialLee, Q., (2000). Quality in the Balance:
environment. Within an organization peopleSix-Sigma - A Socio-Technical System.
have roles they play, positions they work in,Retrieved  online  January  12,  2006  from
and ancillary roles they exercise. Within
their roles, they use their surrounds withSenge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline:
hardware and software to support theirThe art & practice of the learning
roles.- Procedures define operationalorganization. New York, NY: Currency and
procedures in an organization. Procedures areDoubleday.
statements of rules and norms formally
written. Outside the formal writtenTrist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of
procedural statements are unofficial ties tosocio-technical systems: A conceptual
data flow and reporting relationships.framework and an action research program.
Procedures attempt to define culture in a STSOntario Quality of Working Life Center,
but the informal norms and behaviors areOccasional  Paper  no.  2.
equally important to understand when
developing a STS model.- Laws and regulationsU. S. Federal Aviation Administration -
are similar to procedures but impose strongerLogistics Center. Organizational Values.
public sanctions when violated.- Data andRetrieved  online  January  22,  2006  from
data structures in STS involve collection and
storage of an organization's information.Winston, B. (2002). Be a Leader for God's
Additionally, this element explains data use,Sake. Virginia Beach, VA: Regent University,
retrieval, or presentation for use.AnSchool  of  Leadership  Studies.
organization's socio-technical system
supports the business as a great place toWren, D. A. (2005). The History of
work. More than that, STS is a key factor toManagement Thought (5th Ed.) Hoboken, NJ:
supporting leadership initiatives, vision,John  Wiley  and  Sons,  Inc.
and values. Observed in 1949 in Great
Britain, researchers developedWren, J. T. (1995). The Leader's Companion:
socio-technical systems in South YorkshireInsights on Leadership Through the Ages. New
coalmines. They saw the technicalYork,  NY:  The  Free  Press.
improvements in mining coal combined with
highly motivated work groups whoYukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations
self-regulated and collaborated closely(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
became more productive than traditional workEducation.Paul Hoffman is a student at Regent
groups with the same technologicalUniversity studying toward a Doctor of
improvements. Another observation was theStrategic Leadership, holds a MA, Leadership
self-regulated and collaborative teams wereand BS, Organizational Communication. He is
more cooperative among themselves, performingan adjunct at Bellevue University and
multiple tasks rather than one man one job,Metropolitan Community College teaching
and committed to Ortgeist (spirit of theLeadership, Business Communication, and
place) (Aldridge, 2004).STS AppliedSpeech. Paul is a military veteran of almost
OrganizationallyA recent Internet search22 years, has ten years retail management
found the U.S. Federal Aviationexperience, and six years academic and
Administration Logistic Center's statement ofteaching experience.



1 A B C 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86