Socio-Technical Systems and Organizational Values

Modern organizations define themselves usingjob, and committed to Ortgeist (spirit of the place)
statements of vision. They state their vision in terms(Aldridge, 2004).STS Applied OrganizationallyA recent
of human resources and technology, a socio-technicalInternet search found the U.S. Federal Aviation
view. Modern organizations also define themselves inAdministration Logistic Center's statement of beliefs
terms of values. New employees entering theand commitments. Not all cited here; however, these
organization learn the value system from employeesselected ones reinforce concepts of socio-technical
with longevity in it. How organizations incorporatesystems.- Results Oriented - The Logistics Center
socio-technical systems as a reinforcement tool ofconstantly drives for results and success. We drive
their value system is the focus of this paper.ValuesInissues to closure, persist despite obstacles and
business, small and large, values determine course theopposition, and maintain a high energy level. Our
business sets for itself. Yukl (2006) defines values asemployees readily put in the needed time and effort
key statements of an organization. The valueto achieve results.- Innovation - The future of the
statement is ideological, what the organizationLogistics Center is assured only as long as it
considers important. Many values find their way intowelcomes and rewards innovation, creativity, and
organizations including customer service, innovation,resourcefulness. We recognize "trial and error" as
satisfaction of internal and external constituents, andbeing elements of innovation and continuous
excellence. Yulk's view of values suggests somethingimprovement. Innovation has been the cause of
deeper. Organizational values and value creation aresuccess for the Logistics Center.- Quality - We
the soul of competitive edge, competitiveprovide the best quality in all of our products and
advantage.Hill and Jones (1998) write of managementservices. Our goal is to exceed industry benchmarks.-
values as statements of how managers will conductPeople - People are our most important resource. We
themselves and how they will do business. Managersrespect the individual's dignity and value their
in high performing businesses conduct themselvescontributions. We invest in training and education to
with stakeholders in mind. Winston (2002) suggestsgive our employees the tools to make the Logistics
that high performing leaders accept the values of theCenter a world-class organization.- Teamwork and
organization as being of higher consequence andCollaboration - The Logistics Center provides a
importance.SystemsValues of an organizationpositive and challenging environment that supports
(customer service, innovation, satisfaction) imply anthe achievement of mission goals and fosters team
organization is a system. Senge (1990) tells us thatspirit. We are partners with our customers,
organizations are organic systems of interconnectedstakeholders, suppliers, and are committed to union
and interrelated sub-groups. This suggests more thanmanagement partnerships.- Integrity and Openness -
brick and mortar structures, it suggests organizationsThe Logistics Center values trust, sincerity, honesty,
of people, technology, and social interaction.and candor in relationships both personally and
Technology, according to Davis (1996), is aorganizationally. We encourage our employees to
"conceptual bridge" between science and economics.express ideas, opinions, and thoughts in an honest
This link gives form to how organizations manage.and genuine manner.- Corporate Citizenship - The
Conversely, Wren (2005) presents the view ofLogistics Center values a positive corporate image
technological change being disturbing to the socialand is sensitive to our corporate responsibilities to the
system of an organization. Socio-technical systemscommunity. We actively participate and support
offer leverage to dispel the disturbing nature ofcommunity involvement.
change.Socio-Technical SystemsLee (2000) explainsIn post-industrial organizations, STS helps leaders
social of the socio-technical systems as the habitualcreate constructs that are enabling, empowering, in
attitudes of people. He includes the relationshipsturn, enabling and empowering accelerates
between people with their values and behavioralcommunication, and learning and knowledge. Within
styles. He also describes it as the formal powerthe context of knowledge building and knowledge,
structure identified using traditional organizationalsharing, STS, through collaboration, allows work
charts. However, he continues with the aspect of angroups' flexibility to develop original work patterns
informal power structure based on influence andand competitive advantage.Leaders Role in STSDavis
knowledge. The technical system makes up second(1996) urges successful leaders to lead as if the
part of the dyad. This system, according to Leefuture is now. Accomplishing this means seeing the
(2000), is "machinery, processes, procedures and afinal product rather than the processes of the
physical arrangement."A socio-technical system,product. STS employs the right people and the right
abbreviated STS for the remainder of this paper, istechnology at the right time within a structure that
people and technology blended. Yet, this is a muchsupports organizational values.
too simple definition. Some elements of STS areIn an environment of rapid change, having a
closely interrelated; therefore, it is not easy tocompetitive advantage allows organizational foresight.
distinguished items within a STS as purely technical orHowever, foresight requires maintaining core values.
purely social. Aldridge (2004) explains STS asSocio-technical systems support organizational values
approaching organizational work groups as socialby maintaining organizational memory and shared
systems and macro social systems. A third level ofexperiences. Memory and shared experiences provide
work observed is primary work systems. Theviews of where the organization was while keeping
primary work system according to Aldridge is one oreveryone tracking toward future vision. An
more work units involved in face-to-face work. Workorganization with strong STS standards uses their
units collaborate jointly and have support oftechnology to preserve history, create performance
management, relevant technology, resources, andbenchmarks, and develop knowledge and learning
workplace specialists. Aldridge includes the writings ofenvironments. Strong quality systems demonstrate
Trist (1981) when defining macro social systems,teams' abilities to eliminate obsolete practices while
"...macro social systems include systems instaying within the framework of original
communities and entire business sectors as well asvalues.ConclusionStated earlier, organizations are
societal institutions" (Trist, 1981, pg. 11). The STSsystems of interrelated parts with differing skills and
design in work groups is increasing productivity of theskill levels. STS, working within an organizations value
group and increasing job satisfaction throughsystem promotes wisely those with skills, knowledge,
optimization of social factors and integration withand ability. Additionally, STS, working with the value
technical factors.Elements of STSAccording to ansystem, provides workers with the tools needed to
anonymous article on STS, the author explains somegrow in the skills, knowledge, and abilities so they,
of the components integrated into a functionaltoo, can be promoted. Members of self-directed
socio-technical system. Explained separately, eachteams seek new or improved skills from within the
component has its own character; however, it is clearSTS and through their interconnection with team
how closely linked each is and overlaps the others.-members.
Hardware is computers and computing peripherals,Self-directed teams improved productivity and
the classic technology of modern business.commitment to the team and organization in English
Organizations today do not exist without some kindcoalmines in 1949 and self-directed teams continue
of computing network, connecting wires, routers, andbeing productive and committed. Therefore, an
individual workstations.- Software includes operatingorganization employing socio-technical systems can
systems (Windows, UNIX, Apple, etc). As technologygrow into the future, yet hold fast to its historical
advances, it is increasingly difficult to separatepast and the values making the group
hardware and software. Software varies based onviable.References
organizational needs; yet software allows companiesAldridge, J. W. (2004). aboutChange Solutions.
to create data for storage on hardware devices. TheEncyclopedia of Distributed Learning (ISBN
software often runs from the same hardware0-7619-2451-5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
devices used for storage. Software facilitates socialAnonymous, (no date). Why a Social-Technical
interaction by allowing distantly remote people anSystem? Retrieved online January 12, 2006 from
opportunity to message each other in almostAnonymous, (1996 - May-June). Maintaining
real-time.- Physical surroundings (physical setting) helpOrganizational Memories. TQM/CCI News. Retrieved
establish the social and technical rules of engagement.January 22, 2006 from
Building with an open floor plan and open deskDavis, S. (1996). Future Perfect. Reading, MA:
arrangement allows open social interaction amongAddison-Wesley.
workers. Buildings with offices separating workersHill, C. W. L. & Jones, G. R. (1998). Strategic
reduce interaction. Managers with an inner sanctumManagement: An Integrated Approach. Boston, MA:
guarded by a secretary's office establish a hierarchyHoughton Mifflin Company.
of power.- People, by name and by title, make up anLee, Q., (2000). Quality in the Balance: Six-Sigma - A
integral part of any organization culture, socialSocio-Technical System. Retrieved online January 12,
environment. Within an organization people have roles2006 from
they play, positions they work in, and ancillary rolesSenge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The art &
they exercise. Within their roles, they use theirpractice of the learning organization. New York, NY:
surrounds with hardware and software to supportCurrency and Doubleday.
their roles.- Procedures define operational proceduresTrist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical
in an organization. Procedures are statements of rulessystems: A conceptual framework and an action
and norms formally written. Outside the formalresearch program. Ontario Quality of Working Life
written procedural statements are unofficial ties toCenter, Occasional Paper no. 2.
data flow and reporting relationships. ProceduresU. S. Federal Aviation Administration - Logistics
attempt to define culture in a STS but the informalCenter. Organizational Values. Retrieved online January
norms and behaviors are equally important to22, 2006 from
understand when developing a STS model.- Laws andWinston, B. (2002). Be a Leader for God's Sake.
regulations are similar to procedures but imposeVirginia Beach, VA: Regent University, School of
stronger public sanctions when violated.- Data andLeadership Studies.
data structures in STS involve collection and storageWren, D. A. (2005). The History of Management
of an organization's information. Additionally, thisThought (5th Ed.) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons,
element explains data use, retrieval, or presentationInc.
for use.An organization's socio-technical systemWren, J. T. (1995). The Leader's Companion: Insights
supports the business as a great place to work. Moreon Leadership Through the Ages. New York, NY: The
than that, STS is a key factor to supportingFree Press.
leadership initiatives, vision, and values. Observed inYukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations (6th ed.).
1949 in Great Britain, researchers developedUpper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Paul
socio-technical systems in South Yorkshire coalmines.Hoffman is a student at Regent University studying
They saw the technical improvements in mining coaltoward a Doctor of Strategic Leadership, holds a MA,
combined with highly motivated work groups whoLeadership and BS, Organizational Communication. He
self-regulated and collaborated closely became moreis an adjunct at Bellevue University and Metropolitan
productive than traditional work groups with theCommunity College teaching Leadership, Business
same technological improvements. AnotherCommunication, and Speech. Paul is a military veteran
observation was the self-regulated and collaborativeof almost 22 years, has ten years retail management
teams were more cooperative among themselves,experience, and six years academic and teaching
performing multiple tasks rather than one man oneexperience.