| Each person is unique and it is that
| |
| | try to make everyone equal, people are
|
| individuality that we as a whole draw
| |
| | not equal; not genetically and certainly
|
| strength from. We should use such
| |
| | not through different experience of
|
| advantages to our benefit. Plato often
| |
| | nurturing. For instance I am a terrible
|
| wrote about this in The Republic, that
| |
| | accountant and could be good at that but
|
| each member of a society ought to do what
| |
| | it would be a living hell for me to try.
|
| they are best at and be alleviated from
| |
| | This would serve no one if I were
|
| responsibility of those things they are
| |
| | assigned to that position, would it? An
|
| not good at, which can be done by others.
| |
| | accountant may be less suited for the
|
| The individual and the society gain the
| |
| | activities that I tend to excel in.We are
|
| most using this methodology. Why have we
| |
| | so quick to judge and label people with
|
| not considered this wise advice in our
| |
| | disorders or categorize them and duly
|
| culture? Instead we often put people into
| |
| | place them where society has agreed upon
|
| jobs they are unsuited for in patience,
| |
| | in advance that they must be, rather than
|
| competence and ability. Who benefits?
| |
| | looking into the individual. Schools are
|
| Would a Football team, which actually
| |
| | too quick to prescribe students as ADHD
|
| wants to win the game do that? After all;
| |
| | and put them on Prozac. We should be
|
| the guy with the strong foot and lanky
| |
| | finding out where the superior traits can
|
| build ought to be the kicker, not a
| |
| | do the most good. From our studies of
|
| lineman, for he would only be good for
| |
| | different people we find that lower
|
| one play.Yet as our world becomes more
| |
| | intelligence levels find themselves
|
| PC, we seem to be too worried about
| |
| | happier in repetitive jobs.
|
| hurting feelings in the real world and
| |
| |
|
