The Battle of Technology - Linux Vs Windows

The topic here is quite sensational. Both Linux andPrice: Windows vs Linux
Windows have their followers. The question is- whichConsidering the current economic scenario, Microsoft
is better? While Windows is known for its userdid no good by shifting from Exchange to per seat
friendly features, Linux wins hands down owing to itsuser license. This could be pretty expensive for small
varied feature set. Let us compare the two biggiesand medium businesses. Simply stated, a company
on the following parameters:having 50 users/ (seats) would have to pay for 50
Consistency: Windows vs Linuxindividual licenses to Microsoft.
Windows does not quite have a consistent releaseOpen source software licenses do not cost anything.
history. Though Windows 95 created a revolution inGroupware tools like Open-X-Change and
personal computing, Windows 98 failed miserably.eGroupware offer larger feature-set compared to
Windows Me could not do any better; it fadedtheir Microsoft counterpart. The only cost incurred
without even being noticed. Windows NT, developedwould be of hardware. Be it a single user or hundreds
to serve as a portable operating system, could notof users, the cost is same for the software- FREE.
fare well, thanks to its complex functionality.Hardware Compatibility: Windows vs Linux
Microsoft with the launch of Windows XP announcedMicrosoft Vista was not compatible with most
its comeback. Windows 7 is still to mark its presencedevices and systems. Hardware that would run at
Linux, unlike its competitor, ensured consistentexcellent speed slowed down while working with
releases. It would not be wrong to say that eachMicrosoft Vista. Linux, on the contrary, showed
new version of Linux has better features than itscommendable hardware compatibility. Xorg, for
predecessors.instance, proved to be a success.